#PhilosophicalFriday

SUPPOSITIONS – Tai Chi Sword 46

SUPPOSITIONS Tai Chi Sword
by |Published

SUPPOSITIONS

I often find that Tai Chi practitioners are happy to tell us that one is ‘not supposed’ to do this or that. For example in push hands one is not supposed to grab, or in fencing one is not supposed to disengage. If grabbing or disengaging are cited as advantages for those who grab or disengage, why should they be denied that advantage?

Professor Cheng told us not to grab (grip tightly) because it is a disadvantage to the one who grabs, therefore, one would be better advised to execute a counter move (within the Tai Chi principles) instead of telling a person who grabs that they are wrong.

Professor Cheng didn’t tell us not to disengage. He told us (and clearly demonstrated while fencing) to disengage only when it is safe and appropriate. Therefore if the O disengages inappropriately we should use an appropriate counter-move. If our counter is successful, it will address his error more effectively than a verbal admonishment.

SUPPOSITIONS Tai Chi Sword

Author and Images: Ken van Sickle

German version on our sister site!

German version on our sister site!

AUTHOR

Taiji Forum Compilation
Taiji Forum is a non-profit project, realised by a small core team and fuelled by contributions of practitioners from all over the world. Being practitioners ourselves, we are fascinated by the rich heritage of the Chinese internal arts – and we want to share our passion with you! For more information read our "about us" article.

You may also like

TIME AND HUMOUR - Tai Chi Sword 9
Published

TIME AND HUMOUR – Tai Chi Sword 9

If you observe Tai Chi people fencing you will hear more laughter than in any other Tai Chi action, and you may have noticed if you have seen the films of Professor Cheng fencing, that he was definitely ‘amused ’ .